-
favolos80.
User deleted
è vero che la nuova sutura porta allo spreco di 500uf in più rispetto alla sutura normale? . -
orione2.
User deleted
No. l'ho chiesto a wong su hlh e al dr Marzola x telefono.
http://www.hairlosshelp.com/forums/message...LE=&STARTPAGE=1
Edited by orione2 - 9/1/2006, 13:17. -
Ronald the original.
User deleted
ah, meno male . -
.
No question that this closure is worth doing.
I haven't seen long term results, but the short term is very good.
Before Tric closure the scar just look like a 1-2mm space extending the length of the donor area, now it is STILL a 1-2mm space but WITH hairs growing out of it. It looks alot like a high density "FUE into scar" procedure, but without the need to FUE.
IF the scar stretches, as in the case in patients with extreme laxity, or multiple surgeries, there probably won't be much benefit from the tric closure.
I believe there is a bit of confussion on the boards. It should be understood that a tric closure will NOT affect the overall size of the scar, just the APPEARANCE of the scar.
risposta del dottor Feller. -
favolos80.
User deleted
CITAZIONE (BOLA @ 9/1/2006, 18:03)now it is STILL a 1-2mm space but WITH hairs growing out of it. It looks alot like a high density "FUE into scar" procedure, but without the need to FUE.
se è così la fue andrà a farsi fottere.... -
pastdue.
User deleted
se è così, se i capelli sotto possono nascondono il tutto...si fanno a farsi benedire anche i pioneri della fue Cole in èrimis e hasson and wong diventeranno i primi in assoluto e più ricchi di berlusconi!! .
la thricophytic closure spreca UF's? |
